Cynthia Nixon, Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall and Kristin Davis in 2008
A continuing feud between the stars of Love-making and the town has plumbed new depths, with Kim Cattrall accusing Sarah Jessica Parker of exploiting the loss of life of her sibling.
Cattrall’s brother Chris, 55, was found inactive the other day after going lacking from his home in Alberta, Canada.
After announcing his loss of life, Cattrall thanked both her admirers and her Sex and the town co-workers for support.
But four times after publishing that communication, the actor, who played out Samantha on the strike HBO show, adopted it up with a post fond of Parker, criticising her for “trying”, and stating she had been cruel.
My Mom asked me today “When will that @sarahjessicaparker, that hypocrite, leave you alone?” Your continuous reaching out is a painful reminder of how cruel you really were then and now. Let me make this VERY clear. (If I haven’t already) You are not my family. You are not my friend. So I’m writing to tell you one last time to stop exploiting our tragedy in order to restore your ‘nice girl’ persona. Copy and paste link https://nypost.com/2017/10/07/inside-the-mean-girls-culture-that-destroyed-sex-and-the-city/
In the caption, Cattrall said Parker’s “continual trying” was “a painful reminder of how cruel you really were then and now”.
She continued: “You are not my family. You are not my pal” and urged Parker to “stop exploiting our tragedy.”
Cattrall’s post linked to articles in the New York Post from October 2017. It described an ongoing feud between your personalities which culminated with a dispute over whether to produce a third Intimacy and the City movie, which Cattrall said she did not want to do.
Parker hasn’t publicly responded to the statement.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising profits across the advertising are falling fast. And unlike many reports organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – you want to keep our journalism as wide open once we can. So you can see why we need to require your help. The Guardian’s self-employed, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to create. But we get it done because we believe that our perspective issues – because it may be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the marketing to be accessible for all and not a item to be purchased by the few. I’m pleased to contribute so others with less means still get access to information.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who loves it, helps account it, our future would be more secure. For as little as ?1, you can support the Guardian – and it takes merely a minute. Many thanks.